Consiliul Concuren\u0163ei a amendat \u00een urma unei investiga\u0163ii finalizate la finele lui 2006 Cablevision of Romania \u015fi UPC Rom\u00e2nia (\u00een calitate de succesor al Astral Telecom) cu suma total\u0103 de 17,8 de milioane de lei pentru abuz de pozi\u0163ie dominant\u0103 manifestat prin impunerea de tarife majorate \u00een mod nejustificat \u015fi de cre\u015fterea costurilor.<\/p>\n
Decizia autorit\u0103\u0163ii de concuren\u0163\u0103 a fost atacat\u0103 de ambele companii la Curtea de Apel Bucure\u015fti, care s-a pronun\u0163at \u00een favoarea reclaman\u0163ilor. Ulterior, Consiliul Concuren\u0163ei a formulat recurs la \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie \u015fi a c\u00e2\u015ftigat \u00een cazul UPC, \u00een timp ce procesul cu Cablevision of Romania este \u00eenc\u0103 \u00een derulare.<\/p>\n
Astfel, UPC va trebui s\u0103 pl\u0103teasc\u0103 amenda \u00een valoare de 17,6 de milioane de lei.<\/p>\n
\u00cen cadrul aceleia\u015fi investiga\u0163ii, Consiliul Concuren\u0163ei a mai constatat \u015fi sanc\u0163ionat cu aproximativ 8 milioane de lei companiile UPC Rom\u00e2nia \u015fi RCS&RDS (\u00een calitate de succesor al HI-FI Quadral \u015fi TVS Holding) pentru participarea la un cartel av\u00e2nd ca obiect \u00eemp\u0103r\u0163irea pie\u0163ei serviciilor de cablu din municipiul Timi\u015foara. Pentru aceast\u0103 practic\u0103 anticoncuren\u0163ial\u0103, instan\u0163a a anulat amenzile f\u0103r\u0103 a se pronun\u0163a asupra vinov\u0103\u0163iei sau nevinov\u0103\u0163iei companiilor implicate, ci consider\u00e2nd c\u0103 aplicarea sanc\u0163iunilor s-a prescris.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Amenda \u00een valoare de 17,6 de milioane de lei aplicat\u0103 \u00een 2006 de Consiliul Concuren\u0163ei operatorului telecom UPC Rom\u00e2nia pentru abuz de pozi\u0163ie dominant\u0103 a fost men\u0163inut\u0103 \u00een ciuda contesta\u0163iei \u00een instan\u0163\u0103 f\u0103cut\u0103 de companie.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7329],"tags":[17812,9124,24687,6279,8996],"class_list":["post-51001","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-telecom","tag-abuz","tag-amenda","tag-pozitie-dominanta","tag-telecom","tag-upc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51001","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=51001"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51001\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":67966,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51001\/revisions\/67966"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=51001"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=51001"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=51001"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}