{"id":49078,"date":"2011-07-07T11:57:03","date_gmt":"2011-07-07T11:57:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=49078"},"modified":"2026-04-02T20:58:52","modified_gmt":"2026-04-02T20:58:52","slug":"taxa-pe-poluare-instituita-in-romania-inclusiv-cea-modificata-in-decembrie-2009-contrara-dreptului-ue","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=49078","title":{"rendered":"Taxa pe poluare instituita in Romania, inclusiv cea modificata in decembrie 2009, contrara dreptului UE"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Legislatia romana a instituit, incepand de la 1 iulie 2008, o<br \/>\ntaxa de poluare care trebuie sa fie platita cu ocazia primei<br \/>\ninmatriculari a unui autovehicul in Romania. Reglementarea<br \/>\nmentionata nu face distinctie intre vehiculele fabricate in acest<br \/>\nstat membru si cele produse in strainatate. De asemenea, aceasta nu<br \/>\nface distinctie intre vehiculele noi si vehiculele de ocazie,<br \/>\nexplica in hotararea sa de joi Curtea de Justitie a Uniunii<br \/>\nEuropene (CJUE) de la Luxemburg. Domnul Nisipeanu a inmatriculat in<br \/>\nRomania un autovehicul de ocazie cumparat in Germania. Acest<br \/>\nvehicul, inmatriculat in Germania in anul 1997, are o capacitate<br \/>\ncilindrica de 1597 centimetri cubi si respecta norma de poluare<br \/>\nEuro 2. Pentru a putea sa inmatriculeze acest vehicul in Romania,<br \/>\ndomnul Nisipeanu a platit, la data de 1 februarie 2010, suma de<br \/>\n4.431 de lei ca taxa de poluare. Apreciind ca taxa este contrara<br \/>\ndreptului Uniunii, a solicitat restituirea sumei platite.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\n\"http:\/\/www.mediafax.ro\/social\/taxa-pe-poluare-instituita-in-romania-inclusiv-cea-modificata-in-decembrie-2009-contrara-dreptului-ue-8454347\"\ntarget=\"_blank\">Cititi mai multe pe www.mediafax.ro<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Taxa pe poluare prevazuta de legislatia romana, astfel cum a fost modificata inclusiv in decembrie 2009, este contrara dreptului Uniunii Europene, a decis, joi, Curtea de Justitie a UE de la Luxemburg.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[511],"tags":[6577,12825,10168,10758,349],"class_list":["post-49078","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-afaceri","tag-auto","tag-drept","tag-poluare","tag-taxa","tag-ue"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49078","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=49078"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49078\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":66212,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49078\/revisions\/66212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=49078"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=49078"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=49078"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}