\nPotrivit unui comunicat al CCR, Curtea a statuat c\u0103 legea criticat\u0103 nu contravine exigen\u0163elor constitu\u0163ionale impuse de respectarea principiului legalit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een elaborarea actelor normative \u015fi avizarea de c\u0103tre Consiliul Legislativ.<\/p>\n
\n\u201ePrin con\u0163inutul s\u0103u normativ, care vizeaz\u0103 implementarea Registrului Unic al Transparen\u0163ei Intereselor (RUTI) la Parlament, ea nu contravine principiilor separa\u0163iei puterilor \u00een stat (art.1 alin.4) \u015fi nici egalit\u0103\u0163ii \u00een drepturi (art.16). De asemenea, ea nu \u00eencalc\u0103 cerin\u0163ele constitu\u0163ionale privind calitatea legii (art.1 alin.5) \u015fi nici caracterul oficial al limbii rom\u00e2ne (art.13) \u015fi nu contravine dispozi\u0163iilor din Constitu\u0163ie privind rolul Parlamentului (art.61) \u015fi mandatul reprezentativ al deputa\u0163ilor \u015fi senatorilor (art.69)\u201d, arat\u0103 CCR.<\/p>\n
\nCu privire la criticile de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate extrinsec\u0103, care au privit respectarea normelor de tehnic\u0103 legislativ\u0103 \u00een elaborarea expunerii de motive a propunerii legislative, a dispozi\u0163iilor constitu\u0163ionale privind avizul Consiliului Legislativ \u015fi a procedurii de adoptare a legii Curtea a constatat, \u00een esen\u0163\u0103, c\u0103 modific\u0103rile operate prin legea criticat\u0103 se reflect\u0103 \u00een con\u0163inutul expunerii de motive, Consiliul Legislativ a comunicat avizul s\u0103u favorabil, iar \u00een forma legii au fost preluate unele observa\u0163ii cuprinse \u00een aviz, iar aspectele privind \u00eenc\u0103lcarea termenelor \u00een procedura de adoptare a legii vizeaz\u0103 aplicarea regulamentelor parlamentare, f\u0103r\u0103 relevan\u0163\u0103 constitu\u0163ional\u0103, \u00een timp ce dezbaterea liber\u0103 a solu\u0163iilor legislative \u015fi schimbul de idei \u00een Parlament, ca baz\u0103 a democra\u0163iei, nu au fost afectate.<\/p>\n
\nCu privire la criticile de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate intrinsec\u0103, Curtea a constatat c\u0103 statutul juridic specific al deputa\u0163ilor \u015fi senatorilor nu justific\u0103, per se, o diferen\u0163\u0103 de tratament juridic \u00een raport cu celelalte categorii de persoane c\u0103rora li se aplic\u0103 regulile privind transparen\u0163a \u00een exercitarea func\u0163iilor \u015fi demnit\u0103\u0163ilor publice. De asemenea, confrom CCR, reglementarea RUTI la Parlament, sub forma unei platforme publice, accesibil\u0103 online, prin intermediul c\u0103reia deputa\u0163ii \u015fi senatorii public\u0103 informa\u0163ii referitoare la \u00eent\u00e2lnirile dintre ace\u015ftia \u015fi persoanele ter\u0163e, care \u00ee\u015fi manifest\u0103, din proprie ini\u0163iativ\u0103, interesul pentru o ini\u0163iativ\u0103 legislativ\u0103 aflat\u0103 \u00een procedura parlamentar\u0103, reflect\u0103 flexibilitate \u00een redactarea unor norme suple, f\u0103r\u0103 a afecta exigen\u0163ele constitu\u0163ionale de claritate a legii \u015fi caracterul oficial al limbii rom\u00e2ne.<\/p>\n
\n\u201eStabilirea obliga\u0163iilor deputa\u0163ilor \u015fi senatorilor de a se \u00eenregistra \u00een RUTI \u015fi de a publica informa\u0163ii referitoare \u00eent\u00e2lnirile cu persoanele ter\u0163e \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu o ini\u0163iativ\u0103 legislativ\u0103 aflat\u0103 \u00een procedura parlamentar\u0103, nu altereaz\u0103 rolul fundamental al parlamentarilor de a fi \u00een serviciul poporului, concretizat la nivelul legii criticate inclusiv prin instituirea obliga\u0163iei men\u0163inerii unui dialog deschis \u015fi echitabil cu cet\u0103\u0163enii, respectiv cu persoanele ter\u0163e, pe problemele care \u00eei intereseaz\u0103 \u015fi care rezult\u0103 din asumarea \u015fi exercitarea mandatului de parlamentar\u201d, se mai arat\u0103 \u00een comunicat.<\/p>\n
\nDecizia este definitiv\u0103 \u015fi general obligatorie.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei (CCR) a respins miercuri cu unanimitate de voturi obiec\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate formulat\u0103 de parlamentari AUR \u015fi SOS \u015fi a constatat c\u0103 Legea pentru modificarea art.12 din Legea nr.96\/2006 privind Statutul deputa\u0163ilor \u015fi al senatorilor este constitu\u0163ional\u0103.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[285,15283,15282],"class_list":["post-241893","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-ccr","tag-deputati","tag-senatori"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241893","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=241893"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/241893\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=241893"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=241893"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=241893"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}