\nCu participarea unui num\u0103r de 87 de judec\u0103tori, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie a decis, \u00een unanimitate, sesizarea Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale a Rom\u00e2niei pentru controlul constitu\u0163ionalit\u0103\u0163ii, \u00eenainte de promulgare \u00een ceea ce prive\u015fte Legea pentru modificarea \u015fi completarea unor acte normative din domeniul pensiilor de serviciu \u015fi a Legii nr.277\/2015 privind Codul fiscal.<\/p>\n
\n\u201eSesizarea de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate prive\u015fte actul normativ \u00een \u00eentregime, re\u0163in\u00e2ndu-se de c\u0103tre Sec\u0163iile Unite at\u00e2t vicii de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate de natur\u0103 extrinsec\u0103, c\u00e2t \u015fi intrinsec\u0103. Sub primul aspect, a fost avut\u0103 \u00een vedere existen\u0163a urm\u0103toarelor motive de constitu\u0163ionalitate extrinsec\u0103:<\/p>\n
\n– caracterul eterogen al legii \u015fi nesocotirea principiului unicit\u0103\u0163ii reglement\u0103rii. \u00cenc\u0103lcarea art.1 alin.(5) privind principiul legalit\u0103\u0163ii coroborat cu art.147 alin.(4) din Constitu\u0163ia Rom\u00e2niei referitor la caracterul obligatoriu al deciziilor Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale<\/p>\n
\n– \u00cenc\u0103lcarea prevederilor art.75 alin.(1) cu referire la art.73 alin.(3) lit.l) din Constitu\u0163ia Rom\u00e2niei, prin nerespectarea ordinii de sesizare a celor dou\u0103 Camere ale Parlamentului<\/p>\n
\n– \u00cenc\u0103lcarea art.1 alin.(3) \u015fi (5) din Constitu\u0163ie sub aspectul clarit\u0103\u0163ii \u015fi previzibilit\u0103\u0163ii normei juridice\u201d, informeaz\u0103 ICCJ.<\/p>\n
\nDe asemenea, instan\u0163a suprem\u0103 a constatat c\u0103 se impune examinarea mai multor motive de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate intrinsec\u0103.<\/p>\n
\nICCJ a decis sesizarea Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 \u015fi \u00een leg\u0103tur\u0103 cu Legea privind unele m\u0103suri pentru continuarea activit\u0103\u0163ii de c\u0103tre persoanele care \u00eendeplinesc condi\u0163iile de pensionare.<\/p>\n
\n\u201eSesizarea de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate prive\u015fte actul normativ \u00een \u00eentregime, re\u0163in\u00e2ndu-se de c\u0103tre Sec\u0163iile Unite at\u00e2t vicii de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate de natur\u0103 extrinsec\u0103, c\u00e2t \u015fi intrinsec\u0103.<\/p>\n
\nSub primul aspect, a fost avut\u0103 \u00een vedere existen\u0163a urm\u0103toarelor motive de constitu\u0163ionalitate extrinsec\u0103:<\/p>\n
\n– Caracterul eterogen al legii \u015fi nesocotirea principiului unicit\u0103\u0163ii reglement\u0103rii. \u00cenc\u0103lc\u0103rarea art.1 alin.(5) privind principiul legalit\u0103\u0163ii coroborat cu art.147 alin.(4) din Constitu\u0163ia Rom\u00e2niei referitor la caracterul obligatoriu al deciziilor Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale<\/p>\n
\n– \u00cenc\u0103lcarea prevederilor art.75 alin.(1) cu referire la art.73 alin.(3) lit.l) \u015fi n) din Constitu\u0163ia Rom\u00e2niei, prin nerespectarea ordinii de sesizare a celor dou\u0103 Camere ale Parlamentului\u201d, a ad\u0103ugat sursa citat\u0103.<\/p>\n
\nCamera Deputa\u0163ilor a adoptat, miercuri, decizional, proiectul legii pensiilor speciale.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Cu participarea unui num\u0103r de 87 de judec\u0103tori, \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie a decis, \u00een unanimitate, sesizarea Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale a Rom\u00e2niei pentru controlul constitu\u0163ionalit\u0103\u0163ii, \u00eenainte de promulgare \u00een ceea ce prive\u015fte Legea pentru modificarea \u015fi completarea unor acte normative din domeniul pensiilor de serviciu \u015fi a Legii nr.277\/2015 privind Codul fiscal. \u201eSesizarea de […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[13681,15837],"class_list":["post-217394","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-iccj","tag-pensii-speciale"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217394","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=217394"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/217394\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=217394"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=217394"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=217394"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}