{"id":164008,"date":"2018-09-03T17:30:49","date_gmt":"2018-09-03T17:30:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=164008"},"modified":"2018-09-03T17:30:49","modified_gmt":"2018-09-03T17:30:49","slug":"sebastian-ghita-ramane-cu-mandatul-de-arest-preventiv-decizia-curtii-de-apel-ploiesti-este-defintiva","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=164008","title":{"rendered":"Sebastian Ghi\u0163\u0103 r\u0103m\u00e2ne cu mandatul de arest preventiv. Decizia Cur\u0163ii de Apel Ploie\u015fti este defintiv\u0103"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\nDecizia Cur\u0163ii de Apel Ploie\u015fti este definitiv\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>\nS\u0103pt\u0103m\u00eena trecut\u0103, magistra\u0163ii Tribunalului Prahova au respins ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103 cererea fostului deputat Sebastian Ghi\u0163\u0103 de revocare a m\u0103surii arestului preventiv, \u00eens\u0103 decizia instan\u0163ei a putut fi contestat\u0103 \u00een 48 de ore de la comunicarea minutei.<\/p>\n<p>\n\u201ePrin \u00eencheierea pronun\u0163at\u0103 de Sec\u0163ia Penal\u0103 a Tribunalului Prahova, la data de 28.08.2018, \u00een dosarul nr. 3913\/105\/2018, instan\u0163a a respins, \u00een baza dispozi\u0163iilor art. 242 Cod procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, cererea de revocare a m\u0103surii arest\u0103rii preventive, formulat\u0103 de inculpatul Ghi\u0163\u0103 Sebastian Aurelian, ca fiind ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103. \u00cempotriva \u00eencheierii de mai sus-men\u0163ionate, pronun\u0163ate \u00een camera de consiliu, se poate face contesta\u0163ie \u00een termen de 48 de ore de la comunicare\u201d, se ar\u0103ta \u00een decizia instan\u0163ei Tribunalului Prahova.<\/p>\n<p>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/www.mediafax.ro\/social\/sebastian-ghita-ramane-cu-mandatul-de-arest-preventiv-decizia-curtii-de-apel-ploiesti-este-defintiva-17506682\">Cititi mai multe pe www.mediafax.ro<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Magistra\u0163ii Cur\u0163ii de Apel Ploie\u015fti au respins, luni, contesta\u0163ia formulat\u0103 de Sebastian Ghi\u0163\u0103 la decizia Tribunalului Prahova, care a respins ca ne\u00eentemeiat\u0103 cererea acestuia de revocare a m\u0103surii arestului preventiv.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[176,11886,32656,9321,18182,17679,9108,11137,8733,16159,10571,13640,11262,15477],"class_list":["post-164008","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-apel","tag-arest","tag-arestare-preventiva","tag-cerere","tag-curte","tag-curtea-de-apel","tag-decizie","tag-mandat","tag-ploiesti","tag-prahova","tag-respingere","tag-revocare","tag-sebastian-ghita","tag-tribunal"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164008","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=164008"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164008\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=164008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=164008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=164008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}