\nCC a luat \u00een dezbatere joi excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate a dispozi\u0163iilor art.341 alin.(6) lit.c) \u015fi, prin extindere, ale art.341 alin.(7) pct.2 lit.d) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103.<\/p>\n
\nDispozi\u0163iile respective se refer\u0103 la pl\u00e2ngerea \u00eempotriva solu\u0163iei de clasare sau renun\u0163are la urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103.<\/p>\n
\nPotrivit art. 341 alin.(6) lit.c), “\u00een cauzele \u00een care nu s-a dispus punerea \u00een mi\u015fcare a ac\u0163iunii penale, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 poate dispune una dintre urm\u0103toarele solu\u0163ii: [\u2026] c) admite pl\u00e2ngerea \u015fi schimb\u0103 temeiul de drept al solu\u0163iei de clasare atacate, dac\u0103 prin aceasta nu se creeaz\u0103 o situa\u0163ie mai grea pentru persoana care a f\u0103cut pl\u00e2ngerea”.<\/strong><\/p>\n \nPotrivit art. 341 alin.(7) pct.2 lit.d), “\u00een cauzele \u00een care s-a dispus punerea \u00een mi\u015fcare a ac\u0163iunii penale, judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103: [\u2026] 2. verific\u0103 legalitatea administr\u0103rii probelor \u015fi a efectu\u0103rii urm\u0103ririi penale, exclude probele nelegal administrate ori, dup\u0103 caz, sanc\u0163ioneaz\u0103 potrivit art.280-282 actele de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103 efectuate cu \u00eenc\u0103lcarea legii \u015fi: [\u2026] d) admite pl\u00e2ngerea \u015fi schimb\u0103 temeiul de drept al solu\u0163iei de clasare atacate, dac\u0103 prin aceasta nu se creeaz\u0103 o situa\u0163ie mai grea pentru persoana care a f\u0103cut pl\u00e2ngerea”.<\/p>\n \n\u00cen urma deliber\u0103rilor, cu unanimitate de voturi, Curtea a admis excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate \u015fi a constatat c\u0103 dispozi\u0163iile art.341 alin.(6) lit.c) \u015fi, prin extindere, ale art.341 alin.(7) pct.2 lit.d) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 sunt neconstitu\u0163ionale prin \u00eempiedicarea accesului la justi\u0163ie \u00een cazul solu\u0163iilor de renun\u0163are la urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103.<\/strong><\/p>\n \nReferitor la prevederile invocate \u00een sesizarea cu excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate, Ministerul Public a emis un punct de vedere atunci c\u00e2nd \u00cenalta Curte de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie (ICCJ) a fost sesizat\u0103 s\u0103 pronun\u0163e o hot\u0103r\u00e2re prealabil\u0103 pentru dezlegarea unei chestiuni de drept.<\/p>\n \nPotrivit Ministerului Public, faptul c\u0103 legiuitorul nu a inclus expressis verbis \u00een cuprinsul art.341 alin.6 din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103 \u015fi solu\u0163ia de renun\u0163are la urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103, ci numai pe cea de clasare, ar leza principiul accesului liber la justi\u0163ie \u00een cazul unui suspect\/inculpat pentru care urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103 s-a finalizat prin adoptarea unei solu\u0163ii de renun\u0163are la urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103, \u00eentruc\u00e2t acesta nu ar avea posibilitatea s\u0103 ob\u0163in\u0103 o solu\u0163ie de clasare chiar dac\u0103 solicitarea sa ar fi justificat\u0103 prin datele concrete ale cauzei.<\/p>\n \nDecizia Cur\u0163ii Constitu\u0163ionale de joi este definitiv\u0103 \u015fi general obligatorie \u015fi se comunic\u0103 celor dou\u0103 Camere ale Parlamentului, Guvernului \u015fi instan\u0163ei care a sesizat Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103, respectiv Curtea de Apel Oradea – Sec\u0163ia penal\u0103 \u015fi pentru cauze cu minori.<\/p>\n \nArgumenta\u0163iile re\u0163inute \u00een motivarea solu\u0163iei pronun\u0163ate de Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 vor fi prezentate \u00een cuprinsul deciziei, care se va publica \u00een Monitorul Oficial al Rom\u00e2niei, Partea I.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Alte dou\u0103 prevederi din noul Cod de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, privind judecarea \u00een camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 a pl\u00e2ngerilor \u00eempotriva solu\u0163iei de clasare sau renun\u0163are la urm\u0103rirea penal\u0103, au fost declarate neconstitu\u0163ionale, joi, de Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[40253,41944],"class_list":["post-128879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-constitutionalitate","tag-procedura-penala"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=128879"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/128879\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=128879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=128879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=128879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}