{"id":119945,"date":"2015-03-30T18:37:00","date_gmt":"2015-03-30T18:37:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=119945"},"modified":"2015-03-30T18:37:00","modified_gmt":"2015-03-30T18:37:00","slug":"avocatul-poporului-sesizeaza-cc-privind-imposibilitatea-contestarii-masurilor-asiguratorii","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=119945","title":{"rendered":"Avocatul Poporului sesizeaz\u0103 CC privind imposibilitatea contest\u0103rii m\u0103surilor asiguratorii"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n<strong>Avocatul Poporului a sesizat Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 a Rom\u00e2niei cu excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate a art. 250 alin.(6) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, potrivit c\u0103ruia &#8220;\u00eempotriva modului de aducere la \u00eendeplinire a m\u0103surii asigur\u0103torii luate de c\u0103tre judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 ori de c\u0103tre instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103, procurorul, suspectul ori inculpatul sau orice alt\u0103 persoan\u0103 interesat\u0103 poate face contesta\u0163ie la acest judec\u0103tor ori la aceast\u0103 instan\u0163\u0103, \u00een termen de 3 zile de la data punerii \u00een executare a m\u0103surii&#8221;.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\n\u00cen opinia Avocatului Poporului textul legal criticat este neconstitu\u0163ional, contravenind dispozi\u0163iilor art. 21 alin. (1) \u2013 (2), art. 24 alin. (1) \u015fi art. 44 alin (8) din Constitu\u0163ia Rom\u00e2niei. Astfel, prevederile legale criticate permit formularea contesta\u0163iei exclusiv \u00eempotriva modului de aducere la \u00eendeplinire a m\u0103surii asiguratorii luate de c\u0103tre judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 ori de c\u0103tre instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103, nu \u015fi \u00eempotriva m\u0103surii \u00eens\u0103\u015fi, \u00eenc\u0103lc\u00e2ndu-se astfel liberul acces la justi\u0163ie, dreptul la ap\u0103rare \u015fi prezum\u0163ia dob\u00e2ndirii licite a averii.<\/p>\n<p>\n\u00cen timp ce reglementarea anterioar\u0103 \u00een materie (art. 168 din Codul penal din 1969), prevedea at\u00e2t posibilitatea contest\u0103rii m\u0103surii \u015fi a modului de aducere la \u00eendeplinire a acesteia \u00een orice faz\u0103 a procesului penal, c\u00e2t \u015fi recursul \u00eempotriva hot\u0103r\u00e2rii instan\u0163ei, \u00een prezent persoana afectat\u0103 de m\u0103sura asiguratorie este lipsit\u0103 nu numai de posibilitatea recursului, dar chiar \u015fi de calea de atac a contesta\u0163iei m\u0103surii asiguratorii luate de c\u0103tre judec\u0103torul de camer\u0103 preliminar\u0103 ori de c\u0103tre instan\u0163a de judecat\u0103, potrivit Avocatului Poporului.<\/p>\n<p>\nMai mult, semnaleaz\u0103 Avocatul Poporului, \u00een materie a fost adoptat\u0103 Directiva 2014\/42\/UE privind \u00eenghe\u0163area \u015fi confiscarea instrumentelor \u015fi produselor infrac\u0163iunilor s\u0103v\u00e2r\u015fite \u00een Uniunea European\u0103 care instituie obliga\u0163ia statelor membre de a prevedea posibilitatea efectiv\u0103 pentru persoana \u00eempotriva c\u0103reia este dispus\u0103 confiscarea de a ataca hot\u0103r\u00e2rea de confiscare \u00een fa\u0163a unei instan\u0163e (art. 8 alin. (6) teza a doua).<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>Totodat\u0103, art. 8 alin. (8) din aceea\u015fi directiv\u0103 stipuleaz\u0103 c\u0103 \u00een cadrul procedurilor confisc\u0103rii extinse, persoana afectat\u0103 beneficiaz\u0103 de posibilitatea efectiv\u0103 de a contesta circumstan\u0163ele cauzei, inclusiv elementele concrete de fapt \u015fi probele disponibile pe baza c\u0103rora bunurile respective sunt considerate bunuri derivate din activit\u0103\u0163i infrac\u0163ionale.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Avocatul Poporului a sesizat Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 (CC) cu excep\u0163ia de neconstitu\u0163ionalitate a art. 250 alin.(6) din Codul de procedur\u0103 penal\u0103, potrivit c\u0103ruia poate fi contestat numai modul de aducere la \u00eendeplinire a unei m\u0103surii asigur\u0103torii, contrar reglement\u0103rii anterioare \u015fi legisla\u0163iei UE.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[18267,14567],"class_list":["post-119945","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-avocatul-poporului","tag-cc"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119945","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=119945"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119945\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=119945"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=119945"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=119945"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}