{"id":119932,"date":"2015-03-30T17:02:44","date_gmt":"2015-03-30T17:02:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=119932"},"modified":"2015-03-30T17:02:44","modified_gmt":"2015-03-30T17:02:44","slug":"ponta-jurnalistilor-sa-aratati-un-bon-fiscal-daca-vreti-sa-va-raspund-la-intrebari","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=119932","title":{"rendered":"Ponta, jurnali\u015ftilor: S\u0103 ar\u0103ta\u0163i un bon fiscal dac\u0103 vre\u0163i s\u0103 v\u0103 r\u0103spund la \u00eentreb\u0103ri!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n<strong>&#8220;S\u0103 ar\u0103ta\u0163i un bon fiscal dac\u0103 vre\u0163i s\u0103 v\u0103 r\u0103spund la \u00eentreb\u0103ri !&#8221;,<\/strong> a spus Ponta, dup\u0103 care a reluat ideea c\u0103 el r\u0103spunde doar celor care \u00ee\u015fi pl\u0103tesc taxele \u015fi a intrat \u00een biroul pre\u015fedintelui Senatului.<\/p>\n<p>\nLuni la pr\u00e2nz, la finalul \u015fedin\u0163ei Biroului Permanent Na\u0163ional al PSD, Ponta nu a dorit s\u0103 comenteze votul senatorilor PSD \u00eempotriva arest\u0103rii lui \u015eova \u015fi nici s\u0103 spun\u0103 dac\u0103 ace\u015ftia vor fi sanc\u0163iona\u0163i, sus\u0163in\u00e2nd c\u0103 nu \u00een\u0163elege \u00eentrebarea, el nedorind s\u0103 comenteze nici eventuale modific\u0103ri ale Codului Penal, pe motiv c\u0103 nu cunoa\u015fte proiectul.<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>&#8220;Nu m\u0103 voi pronun\u0163a, c\u0103 nu sunt senator. Cred c\u0103 dezbaterea politic\u0103 pe aceast\u0103 tem\u0103 s-a dep\u0103rtat total de cea juridic\u0103 \u015fi cred c\u0103, din punctul \u0103sta de vedere, eu am obliga\u0163ia s\u0103 asigur guvernarea \u0163\u0103rii. Partea de scandal e asigurat\u0103 de Gorghiu \u015fi compania<\/strong>&#8220;, a spus Ponta, la solicitarea presei de a aprecia dac\u0103 votul senatorilor \u00een cazul \u015eova a fost unul corect.<\/p>\n<p>\n\u00centrebat de jurnali\u015fti dac\u0103 senatorii PSD care au votat \u00eempotriva arest\u0103rii lui \u015eova vor fi sanc\u0163iona\u0163i pe linie de partid av\u00e2nd \u00een vedere c\u0103 exist\u0103 o decizie a Biorului Permanent Na\u0163ional ca toate astfel de cereri formulate de c\u0103tre procurori s\u0103 fie avizate favorabil, Ponta a r\u0103spuns c\u0103 nu dore\u015fte s\u0103 comenteze acest lucru, sus\u0163in\u00e2nd c\u0103 nu \u00een\u0163elege \u00eentrebarea.<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>&#8220;P\u00e2n\u0103 nu \u00een\u0163eleg \u00eentrebarea, nu doresc s\u0103 v\u0103 comentez&#8221;<\/strong>, a spus Ponta.<\/p>\n<p>\nEl nu a dorit s\u0103 comenteze nici eventuale modific\u0103ri la Codul de Procedur\u0103 Penal\u0103 promovate de c\u0103tre parlamentari PSD, sus\u0163in\u00e2nd c\u0103 nu cunoa\u015fte acest proiect.<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>&#8220;Dumneavoastr\u0103 de unde ave\u0163i aceste lucruri ? Eu nu cunosc. C\u00e2nd o s\u0103 le cunosc, o s\u0103 comentez<\/strong>&#8220;, le-a spus Ponta jurnali\u015ftilor.<\/p>\n<p>\n\u00cen acela\u015fi timp, r\u0103spunz\u00e2nd unei alte \u00eentreb\u0103ri, \u015fi anume dac\u0103 este normal ca ANAF s\u0103 \u00eenchid\u0103 firme pentru 3,5 lei, Ponta a afirmat c\u0103 eventuale abuzuri ale Agen\u0163iei Na\u0163ionale de Administrare Fiscal\u0103 (ANAF) \u00een combaterea evaziunii fiscale vor fi sanc\u0163ionate, apreciind \u00eens\u0103 c\u0103 exist\u0103 o &#8220;fr\u0103\u0163ie a evazioni\u015ftilor fiscali&#8221; care ar critica ANAF.<\/p>\n<p>\nUlterior, Ponta a postat un mesaj pe Facebook \u00een care spunea c\u0103 vrea s\u0103 explice de ce a refuzat s\u0103 r\u0103spund\u0103 la \u00eentrebarea unui jurnalist privind votul senatorilor PSD \u00een cazul \u015eova, sus\u0163in\u00e2nd c\u0103 el r\u0103spunde doar la \u00eentreb\u0103rile celor care reprezint\u0103 companii ce \u00ee\u015fi achit\u0103 corect taxele.<\/p>\n<p>\n&#8220;Doresc s\u0103 l\u0103muresc situa\u0163ia foarte clar \u015fi s\u0103 explic refuzul meu de azi de a r\u0103spunde la \u00eentrebarea unui anume jurnalist (\u015fi chiar a\u015f dori s\u0103 aflu p\u0103rerea celor care citesc aceast\u0103 pagin\u0103 de FB!). Ocup\u00e2nd o func\u0163ie public\u0103, pl\u0103tit\u0103 din banii contribuabililor, este corect \u015fi obligatoriu s\u0103 r\u0103spund la \u00eentreb\u0103rile (\u015fi s\u0103 particip la emisiunile) tuturor reporterilor \u015fi jurnali\u015ftilor reprezent\u00e2nd companiile de pres\u0103 care pl\u0103tesc corect taxe \u015fi impozite &#8211; oric\u00e2t de critice sunt acestea fa\u0163\u0103 de activitatea mea! Ca \u015fef al Guvernului \u00eens\u0103, \u00een contextul eforturilor de combatere a evaziunii fiscale, trebuie s\u0103 dau un semnal clar de avertizare a celor care fac evaziune fiscal\u0103, nu pl\u0103tesc nici m\u0103car contribu\u0163iile sociale ale salaria\u0163ilor (uneori nici salariile!) \u015fi fac concuren\u0163\u0103 neloial\u0103 celor cinsti\u0163i \u015fi corec\u0163i. \u015ei primul gest normal e s\u0103 nu r\u0103spund \u00een niciun fel \u00eentreb\u0103rilor acestora! Dac\u0103 patronii \u015fi managerii lor se hot\u0103resc s\u0103 intre \u00een legalitate \u015fi normalitate \u00eenseamn\u0103 c\u0103 scopul a fost atins. Altfel nu a\u015f face dec\u00e2t s\u0103 \u00eencurajez asemenea atitudini (inclusiv atacurile la adresa ANAF din partea celor subiectivi deoarece se afl\u0103 chiar ei \u00een culp\u0103). A\u015ftept cu interes opinia dvs \u015fi v\u0103 mul\u0163umesc&#8221;, a scris Ponta pe Facebook.<\/p>\n<p>\nSenatorii au respins, miercurea trecut\u0103, solicitarea procurorilor DNA pentru re\u0163inerea \u015fi arestarea senatorului PSD Dan \u015eova \u00een dosarul privind contractele \u00eencheiate de firma sa de avocatur\u0103 cu complexurile Turceni \u015fi Rovinari. Chiar dac\u0103 majoritatea senatorilor prezen\u0163i au votat &#8220;pentru&#8221;, cererea a fost respins\u0103 \u00eentruc\u00e2t nu a fost \u00eentrunit votul majorit\u0103\u0163ii senatorilor, potrivit Statutului senatorilor \u015fi deputa\u0163ilor. Pe de alt\u0103 parte, potrivit Constitu\u0163iei, hot\u0103r\u00e2rile camerelor Parlamentului se adopt\u0103 cu majoritatea voturilor membrilor prezen\u0163i.<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>Ulterior, Dan \u015eova a anun\u0163at c\u0103 a luat decizia de a se autosuspenda \u201ddin toate func\u0163iile de\u0163inute \u00een cadrul PSD\u201d \u015fi a sus\u0163inut c\u0103 votul din Senat \u00eei va permite s\u0103 se apere \u201da\u015fa cum se cuvine\u201d, dac\u0103 dosarul s\u0103u va ajunge \u00een instan\u0163\u0103.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\nPre\u015fedintele Klaus Iohannis afirma, dup\u0103 ce Senatul a respins cererea DNA de arestare a lui \u015eova, c\u0103 nu poate trece cu vederea faptul c\u0103 Parlamentul a blocat iar o cerere a justi\u0163iei, ar\u0103t\u00e2nd c\u0103, \u00eentr-un stat de drept, nimeni nu este mai presus de lege, iar Parlamentul nu se poate erija \u00een instan\u0163\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>\nAmbasadele SUA, Marii Britanii, Olandei \u015fi Germaniei, dar \u015fi Comisia Europen\u0103 au criticat decizia, manifest\u00e2nd surprindere \u015fi \u00eengrijorare \u015fi atr\u0103g\u00e2nd aten\u0163ia c\u0103 Rom\u00e2nia trebuie s\u0103 respecte recomand\u0103rile MCV \u015fi \u00een ceea ce prive\u015fte imunitatea parlamentarilor.<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 (CC) a fost sesizat\u0103 de PNL privind decizia Senatului, urm\u00e2nd s\u0103 analizeze sesizarea pe 8 aprilie.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\nTot atunci, CC va discuta \u015fi cererea pre\u015fedintelui Klaus Iohannis de solu\u0163ionare a conflictului juridic de natur\u0103 constitu\u0163ional\u0103 dintre Ministerul Public \u015fi Parlament, \u015feful statului ar\u0103t\u00e2nd c\u0103 atitudinea legislativului \u00een cazuri precum cel al lui Dan \u015eova a condus la un blocaj institu\u0163ional.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Liderul PSD, premierul Victor Ponta, aflat la Parlament, a trecut prin fa\u0163a unui grup de jurnali\u015fti \u015fi, \u00eenainte ca ace\u015ftia s\u0103 \u00eei adreseze vreo \u00eentrebare, le-a cerut s\u0103 \u00eei prezinte un bon fiscal dac\u0103 vor s\u0103 ob\u0163in\u0103 r\u0103spunsuri din partea lui.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[15420,7469],"class_list":["post-119932","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-ponta","tag-presa"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119932","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=119932"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/119932\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=119932"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=119932"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=119932"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}