{"id":115725,"date":"2014-12-18T16:55:06","date_gmt":"2014-12-18T16:55:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=115725"},"modified":"2014-12-18T16:55:06","modified_gmt":"2014-12-18T16:55:06","slug":"justitia-europeana-se-pronunta-impotriva-aderarii-ue-la-conventia-europeana-a-drepturilor-omului","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=115725","title":{"rendered":"Justi\u0163ia european\u0103 se pronun\u0163\u0103 \u00eempotriva ader\u0103rii UE la Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n<strong>Cele 28 de state membre UE sunt membre ale Consiliului Europei, format din 47 de \u0163\u0103ri, \u015fi au aderat individual la Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului, care permite fiec\u0103rui cet\u0103\u0163ean s\u0103 se adreseze Cur\u0163ii Europene pentru Drepturile Omului de la Strasbourg (CEDO).<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\nUE nu este membr\u0103, \u00eens\u0103 aderarea este prev\u0103zut\u0103 \u00een Tratatul de la Lisabona, din 2009. Un acord \u00een acest sens a fost \u00eencheiat \u00een aprilie 2013 \u00eentre Comisia European\u0103 \u015fi Consiliul Europei. Comisia a cerut ulterior avizul Cur\u0163ii de Justi\u0163ie de la Luxemburg cu privire la compatibilitatea proiectului de acord cu dreptul Uniunii Europene.<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>Invoc\u00e2nd o serie de argumente juridice, Curtea de Justi\u0163ie a decis c\u0103 &#8220;proiectul de acord cu privire la aderarea Uniunii Europene la CEDO nu este compatibil cu dispozi\u0163iile dreptului Uniunii&#8221;.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\nDe asemenea, Curtea constat\u0103 c\u0103 &#8220;nicio dispozi\u0163ie din proiectul de acord nu prevede asigurarea coordon\u0103rii&#8221; \u00eentre Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului \u015fi Carta european\u0103 a drepturilor fundamentale.<\/p>\n<p>\nTotodat\u0103, Curtea consider\u0103 c\u0103 abordarea re\u0163inut\u0103, &#8220;care const\u0103 \u00een asimilarea Uniunii Europene unui stat \u015fi rezervarea unui rol identic pentru UE cu cel al oric\u0103rei alte p\u0103r\u0163i contractante, ignor\u0103 natura intrinsec\u0103 a Uniunii&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>\n&#8220;Aderarea UE la Conven\u0163ia european\u0103 este o obliga\u0163ie juridic\u0103&#8221;, \u00een conformitate cu Tratatul de la Lisabona, din 2009, a afirmat, \u00een replic\u0103, purt\u0103torul de cuv\u00e2nt al Comisiei Europene, Margaritis Schinas, \u00eentr-o conferin\u0163\u0103 de pres\u0103. &#8220;Comisia va analiza \u00een detaliu opinia Cur\u0163ii de Justi\u0163ie, care ridic\u0103 mai multe \u00eentreb\u0103ri juridice importante&#8221;, a precizat el. &#8220;Comisia va lua toate m\u0103surile necesare \u00een urma consult\u0103rilor cu p\u0103r\u0163ile contractante \u015fi cu Parlamentul European&#8221;, a mai precizat el, f\u0103r\u0103 s\u0103 anun\u0163e un termen precis \u00een acest sens.<\/p>\n<p>\nConven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului a intrat \u00een vigoare la 3 decembrie 1953. Aderarea UE la Conven\u0163ia european\u0103, dorit\u0103 din 1970, nu s-a concretizat p\u00e2n\u0103 acum, iar Curtea de Justi\u0163ie a UE a decis \u015fi \u00een 1996 c\u0103 nu sunt de\u0163inute competen\u0163ele \u00een acest sens de c\u0103tre Comunitatea European\u0103.<\/p>\n<p>\n<strong>La r\u00e2ndul s\u0103u, Comisia European\u0103 a argumentat c\u0103 aderarea UE la Conven\u0163ie va &#8220;finaliza sistemul european de protec\u0163ie a drepturilor fundamentale ale cet\u0103\u0163enilor&#8221; \u015fi &#8220;va consolida credibilitatea sistemului drepturilor omului \u015fi politica extern\u0103 a Europei&#8221;.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Justi\u0163ia european\u0103 s-a pronun\u0163at, joi, \u00eempotriva ader\u0103rii UE la Conven\u0163ia European\u0103 a Drepturilor Omului, \u00eens\u0103 Bruxellesul \u015fi-a anun\u0163at inten\u0163ia de a &#8220;continua negocierile&#8221;.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[7323,349],"class_list":["post-115725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-justitie","tag-ue"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=115725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/115725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=115725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=115725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=115725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}