\nLa fel de slabe au fost \u015fi \u00eencerc\u0103rile echipelor de campanie de a copia stilul american, cu dezv\u0103luiri pretins incendiare despre via\u0163a personal\u0103 a candida\u0163ilor, ori \u00eencerc\u0103rile clasic rom\u00e2ne\u015fti, bine exersate \u00een toate campaniile, de \u00eenfrico\u015fare, demonizare \u015fi culpabilizare a electoratului care ar \u00eendr\u0103zni s\u0103 voteze “iresponsabil” cu anumi\u0163i candida\u0163i, acuza\u0163i c\u0103 vor distruge \u0163ara dac\u0103 ar ajunge la Cotroceni.<\/p>\n
\n\u00cen acest context, prim-planul campaniei a fost ocupat natural de ac\u0163iunile justi\u0163iei, cu explozia f\u0103r\u0103 precedent de dosare de la DNA, declan\u015fate sau anun\u0163ate, care au afectat, \u00eentr-un fel sau altul, politicieni de toate culorile implica\u0163i \u00een campanie (Microsoft, Lukoil, Retroced\u0103rile ilegale de p\u0103duri, Trafic de influen\u0163\u0103 pentru amnistie \u015fi gra\u0163iere, Referendumul din 2012, Bercea Mondial, EADS, Loteria) \u015fi cu am\u00e2narea repetat\u0103 la CCR \u015fi la ICCJ a deznod\u0103m\u00e2ntului privind recursul ANI \u00een dosarul incompatibilit\u0103\u0163ii lui Klaus Iohannis. Ca atare, echipele de campanie au \u00eencercat s\u0103 speculeze \u00een favoarea propriului candidat aceste ac\u0163iuni ale justi\u0163iei, \u00eentr-un efort de a convinge electoratul, dup\u0103 caz, ba c\u0103 “se urm\u0103re\u015fte” scoaterea incorect\u0103 din joc a candidatului (de c\u0103tre adversarii politici, serviciile secrete, SUA, UE etc), ba c\u0103 justi\u0163ia, serviciile, SUA \u015fi UE \u00eel sprijin\u0103 pe respectivul candidat, inclusiv prin eliminarea adversarilor s\u0103i corup\u0163i, pentru c\u0103 numai el e de partea binelui \u015fi a drept\u0103\u0163ii.<\/p>\n
\nPentru electoratele deja ferm decise, exploatarea propagandistic\u0103 a ac\u0163iunilor justi\u0163iei n-a schimbat oricum mare lucru \u00een inten\u0163iile de vot; pentru cei mai pu\u0163in deci\u015fi, nu at\u00e2t v\u00e2nzoleala dosarelor, c\u00e2t mai ales zvonistica \u015fi scenarita aferente au putut genera \u00eens\u0103 fie un efect de demobilizare, fie de \u00eendreptare c\u0103tre candida\u0163i din e\u015falonul al doilea, mereu gata s\u0103 func\u0163ioneze ca destinatari ai votului de protest.<\/p>\n
\nUltimele sondaje de opinie f\u0103cute publice de institutele de sondare \u00eei plaseaz\u0103 pe Victor Ponta \u015fi Klaus Iohannis pe primele locuri \u00een inten\u0163ia de vot pentru turul I. Difer\u0103 \u00eens\u0103 at\u00e2t procentele atribuite celor doi candida\u0163i, c\u00e2t \u015fi rezultatele privind ocupan\u0163ii locurilor 3-4: sondaj Sociopol – Ponta 41%, Iohannis 28%, T\u0103riceanu 7%, Udrea 6%; sondaj CSCI – Ponta 40%, Iohannis 29%, T\u0103riceanu 8%, Udrea 6%; sondaj IRES – Ponta 41%, Iohannis 30%, Udrea 7%, Macovei 6%; sondaj INSCOP – Ponta 40,6%, Iohannis 30,1%, Udrea 6,7%, T\u0103riceanu 6,2%; sondaj CCSCC – Ponta 36%, Iohannis 30%, Macovei 7%, T\u0103riceanu 6%. Pentru turul al doilea, toate casele de sondaje, cu excep\u0163ia ultimei, care indic\u0103 egalitate \u00eentre Ponta \u015fi Iohannis, prezic victoria lui Ponta, la o diferen\u0163\u0103 estimat\u0103 de 7% (INSCOP) sau 10% (Sociopol, CSCI) fa\u0163\u0103 de Iohannis.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
O campanie electoral\u0103 marcat\u0103 de lipsa apetitului pentru dezbateri directe \u00eentre candida\u0163i \u015fi de programe electorale superficial \u00eentocmite a confirmat verdictul pre\u015fedintelui Traian B\u0103sescu dup\u0103 care nivelul preziden\u0163iabililor din 2014 e mai slab dec\u00e2t al celor din 2004 sau 2009.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[14263,4885,7446,10017,285,38501,36846,26,15940,38500,26361,7323,220,38499,7419],"class_list":["post-113599","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-alegeri-prezidentiale","tag-ani","tag-campanie-electorala","tag-candidati","tag-ccr","tag-ccscc","tag-csci","tag-dna","tag-dosare","tag-inscop","tag-ires","tag-justitie","tag-politica","tag-sociopol","tag-sondaj"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113599","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=113599"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/113599\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=113599"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=113599"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=113599"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}