{"id":105512,"date":"2014-03-26T16:27:42","date_gmt":"2014-03-26T16:27:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=105512"},"modified":"2014-03-26T16:27:42","modified_gmt":"2014-03-26T16:27:42","slug":"cc-articolul-privind-calcularea-vechimii-doar-pentru-magistratii-fosti-avocati-neconstitutional","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=105512","title":{"rendered":"CC: Articolul privind calcularea vechimii doar pentru magistra\u0163ii fo\u015fti avoca\u0163i, neconstitu\u0163ional"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\n&nbsp;Surse din cadrul CC au precizat, pentru MEDIAFAX, c\u0103 doi magistra\u0163i care doreau s\u0103 fie promova\u0163i \u00een func\u0163ii de conducere au reclamat c\u0103 articolul respectiv \u00eencalc\u0103 principiul egalit\u0103\u0163ii.<\/p>\n<p>\nOdat\u0103 cu decizia de miercuri a Cur\u0163ii, pentru a candida la o func\u0163ie de conducere din cadrul unei instan\u0163e sau al unui parchet, un magistrat poate s\u0103 fi exercitat anterior o alt\u0103 profesie juridic\u0103, nu doar cea de avocat, perioada \u00een care acesta a practicat-o fiind luat\u0103 \u00een calcul \u00een calcularea vechimii.<\/p>\n<p>\nArticolul declarat neconstitu\u0163ional prevede c\u0103 &#8220;la calcularea vechimii prev\u0103zute la alin. (1) (pentru numirea \u00een func\u0163ii de conducere &#8211; n. red.) se ia \u00een considerare \u015fi perioada \u00een care judec\u0103torul sau procurorul a fost avocat&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.mediafax.ro\/social\/cc-articolul-privind-calcularea-vechimii-doar-pentru-magistratii-fosti-avocati-neconstitutional-12336895\">Cititi mai multe pe<\/a> www.mediafax.ro<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Articolul din Legea 303\/2004 privind statutul judec\u0103torilor \u015fi procurorilor care prevede c\u0103 luarea \u00een calcul a vechimii, \u00een situa\u0163ia numirii \u00een func\u0163ii de conducere, doar pentru magistra\u0163ii care au fost avoca\u0163i este neconstitu\u0163ional, a decis, miercuri, Curtea Constitu\u0163ional\u0103 (CC).<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[32901,5451,339,18182,9108,15874,15987,17563,9759,32670,15511],"class_list":["post-105512","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-articol","tag-avocati","tag-conducere","tag-curte","tag-decizie","tag-functii","tag-magistrati","tag-neconstitutional","tag-numire","tag-prevedere","tag-vechime"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105512","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=105512"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/105512\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=105512"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=105512"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=105512"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}