{"id":102951,"date":"2014-01-10T12:06:04","date_gmt":"2014-01-10T12:06:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=102951"},"modified":"2014-01-10T12:06:04","modified_gmt":"2014-01-10T12:06:04","slug":"dosarul-lui-liviu-dragnea-privind-fraude-la-referendum-ramane-la-iccj","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/?p=102951","title":{"rendered":"Dosarul lui Liviu Dragnea privind fraude la referendum r\u0103m\u00e2ne la ICCJ"},"content":{"rendered":"

\n Judec\u0103torii \u00cenaltei Cur\u0163i de Casa\u0163ie \u015fi Justi\u0163ie au anun\u0163at, vineri, deciziile \u00een cazul unor cereri f\u0103cute la termenul din 6 decembrie 2013, \u00een dosarul “Fraud\u0103 la referendum”.<\/p>\n

\nInstan\u0163a s-a pronun\u0163at pe o cerere f\u0103cut\u0103 la termenul anterior de avocatul lui Liviu Dragnea, prin care solicita retrimiterea dosarului la DNA pentru refacerea urm\u0103ririi penale, \u00eentruc\u00e2t procurorii nu i-au permis vicepremierului s\u0103 studieze integral materialul de urm\u0103rire penal\u0103, astfel c\u0103 nu a putut s\u0103 ia la cuno\u015ftin\u0163\u0103 toate probele \u015fi s\u0103 fac\u0103 cereri \u00een ap\u0103rare.<\/p>\n

\nJudec\u0103torii \u015fi-au motivat pe scurt decizia \u015fi au ar\u0103tat c\u0103 nu pot s\u0103 analizeze probe \u015fi alte chestiuni ce \u0163in de fondul dosarului la acest moment, pentru c\u0103 nu se afl\u0103 \u00een etapa procedural\u0103. Potrivit instan\u0163ei, chestiuni referitoare la modul de lucru al procurorului nu se rezolv\u0103 \u00een cadrul unui proces penal, ci prin sesiz\u0103ri ulterioare, la alte organe competente.<\/p>\n

\nCititi mai multe pe<\/a> www.mediafax.ro<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Dosarul “Fraud\u0103 la referendum”, \u00een care sunt acuza\u0163i Liviu Dragnea \u015fi alte 74 de persoane, r\u0103m\u00e2ne la ICCJ, dup\u0103 ce judec\u0103torii au respins at\u00e2t cererea ca unii dintre inculpa\u0163i s\u0103 fie judeca\u0163i de alte instan\u0163e, c\u00e2t \u015fi solicitarea ca dosarul s\u0103 fie retrimis la DNA, pentru refacerea urm\u0103ririi penale.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[510],"tags":[9321,13732,26,13545,13673,26707,13594,13681,12446,19033,33214,7522,80,18654,13253,18836],"class_list":["post-102951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-actualitate","tag-cerere","tag-cereri","tag-dna","tag-dosar","tag-dragnea","tag-fraudare","tag-fraude","tag-iccj","tag-instanta","tag-judecatori","tag-refacere","tag-referendum","tag-refuz","tag-solicitare","tag-termen","tag-urmarire-penala"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=102951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/102951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=102951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=102951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/bm.dev.synology.me\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=102951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}